← Back to overview

China compact

The Sino-Canadian Technology Compact

EVs, robotics and renewables: Chinese technology in Canadian-majority companies — China's own playbook, run in reverse.

The auto pivot generalizes — but the structure differs by partner. Canada's original opening ask ran China's own 1994–2018 playbook in reverse: 75/25 ownership, half the funding, mandatory technology transfer. Independent review and verified law killed that version — Chinese export controls now prohibit the technology transfer, and US entity rules punish the equity. What survives is two term sheets: allies (Japan, Korea, EU) get offtake-and-finance partnerships with commercially negotiated licensing and training pipelines; China gets capacity-and-jobs contract manufacturing with no equity in sensitive sectors and no IP pretensions. The training ambition (~10,000 engineers, ~50,000 trades) survives — attached to the allied verticals where technology cooperation is actually lawful.

Watch: the balancing act this compact is designed around

Why Canada's trade deal with China tests Ottawa's balancing act
DW News

Independent third-party video, included for context — not produced by or affiliated with this site, and inclusion is not an endorsement of every claim made in it.

Ramp to maturity

Three verticals

VerticalChinese partners (candidates)Capex (C$B)China fundsOutputWhat Canada gets

Why the two-sheet structure works for every party

The strategic frame — and the tension, stated honestly